"Educational Freedom" is False Advertising


"Educational Freedom" is False Advertising

By Nancy Bailey | Originally published on Nancy Bailey’s Education Website nancyebailey.com | Twitter: @NancyEBailey1

By Nancy Bailey

It sounds so patriotic…Educational Freedom. But public education in traditional public schools is what is truly educational freedom.

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos and other conservatives like former Florida Governor Jeb Bush and current Tennessee Governor Bill Lee are touting their idea of Educational Freedom and they repeatedly make comments implying that poor children will get their choice of any school they want with an Educational Savings Account.

For example, recently Gov. Lee tweeted:

Expanded options create greater opportunity. That’s why we need ESAs this year to empower low-income students from our most under-performing school districts to attend a school of their choice at no cost to their family.

If you are a struggling parent and you hear or read this, you might think you have a chance of placing your child in a wealthy private school, or a parochial school, for free. This is essentially what Lee is stating.

Former Governor Jeb Bush has said the same thing:

All families should have the power to determine the best educational path for their children. The Education Freedom Scholarship Program will expand successful choice efforts in states across the country, empowering more families to explore educational opportunities without increasing the size of government or raising taxes.

Have private and parochial schools in the State of Tennessee, Florida, and around the country changed their admission policies to open enrollment? These ESA promises, often connected with statements about a child’s zip code, don’t mention that private and parochial schools control admissions and rejections.

Ask exclusive private and parochial school administrators if they will change the rules to admit and keep all students, like public schools always do.

When those schools fill up, will parents be able to sue the private or parochial school because their child did not get into the school? Or will they be able to sue the state if their choice school rejects their child or has no availability?

How do wealthy private schools feel about the above questions? Are their administrators readying their schools for the influx of students who will enter private and parochial schools? Are they creating better programs to serve the poorest of the poor?

If a child gets a voucher worth $7,000, and the private school costs $25,000 a year, who will pay the difference?

Lee goes on to say that Educational Freedom Establishes an Education Savings Account program to provide quality school choice options for students in low-performing districts. Creates an independent charter school authorizer, expands facilities access for charter schools.

This sounds like the only real choice a poor child will have is between a charter school and a public school. A recent Washington Post report indicates that the government has spent billions on charters that never opened! Or they opened and closed due to poor management.

Considering that so many charter schools fail at what they promise, and the Achievement School District in Memphis is a good example, it sounds like children have very little choice to no choice at all.

The notion that any child can attend the private or parochial school of their choice is not true unless the family is rich. A wealthier parent with a child who is accepted into the school will get a nice supplement to their tuition price.

The educational freedom they are speaking about is apparently not really for the poor. It’s false advertising, or a lie.